Home / Monte Carlo / Additional Tools / Sampling Matrices / Math Details
Math Details¶
How each of the three matrices is built. What the tool produces is on Sampling Matrices, and every control is on Options.
This is not a simulation. It reads no model and touches no marked workbook. It writes a plan you take away and run experiments against.
What every matrix has in common¶
Rows are cases, columns are factors, and every value lies strictly between 0 and 1. Neither endpoint is ever produced, so an inverse distribution function on the worksheet is never handed a 0 or a 1.
With \(n\) cases, each column is divided into \(n\) equal slices
and each method decides where in a slice its point sits and how the points are ordered down the column.
Descriptive Sampling¶
One point per slice, at the slice midpoint:
so the set of values in a column is fixed and only their order varies. The column is then shuffled.
Latin Hypercube¶
One point per slice, drawn at random inside the slice, rather than at its midpoint:
Every column draws its own points and every column is shuffled independently, including the first.
The shuffle is a Fisher-Yates draw from one seeded stream, so every ordering is equally likely and the same seed reproduces the same matrix bit for bit.
Sobol¶
A quasi-random sequence rather than a shuffled stratification: the points are chosen so that they spread evenly in every dimension at once, using an embedded direction-number table.
The case count must be a power of two. One point per slice in every dimension holds at \(2^m\) points and not between powers of two, which is the reason to choose Sobol at all. A count that is not a power of two is refused rather than rounded.
The limits¶
One set of limits for every build. A count outside them is refused by name and never quietly clamped or rounded.
| Descriptive Sampling and Latin Hypercube | Sobol | |
|---|---|---|
| Cases | 2 to 20,000 | 16 to 32,768, and a power of two |
| Factors | 1 to 250 | 1 to 1,000 |
Sobol's factor cap is the size of the embedded direction-number table.
What the previous version got wrong¶
Recorded because a matrix from v17 will not match one from v18, and the difference is not a regression.
| v17 behaviour | Now |
|---|---|
| Latin Hypercube copied the first column's points into every column, making it Descriptive Sampling with random points instead of midpoints | each column draws its own point inside each slice |
| the first column was never reordered, so case 1 always held the smallest value of the first factor | every column is reordered, the first included |
| the reorder picked its swap partner from the whole range at every step, which does not make every ordering equally likely, and no seed was set so a matrix could not be recreated | a correct Fisher-Yates from one seeded stream, and the same seed gives the same matrix |
See Also¶
- Sampling Matrices, what the worksheet contains
- Options, every control on the dialog
- Additional Tools